IIHF STANDS FIRM: RUSSIA AND BELARUS REMAIN BANNED

img

The International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) has extended its ban on Russia and Belarus, preventing their national teams from competing in the 2025 and 2026 World Championships.

Rus­sia has already vowed to chal­lenge the deci­sion.

This move under­scores the con­tin­ued inter­na­tion­al iso­la­tion of both regimes, which have long used sports as pro­pa­gan­da tools to legit­imize their rule. The IIHF’s stance sends a clear mes­sage: aggres­sion and author­i­tar­i­an­ism have no place in glob­al sports.

At the same time, the Inter­na­tion­al Olympic Com­mit­tee (IOC) took a very dif­fer­ent approach. Just yes­ter­day, the IOC offi­cial­ly rec­og­nized the results of the Belaru­sian Nation­al Olympic Com­mit­tee (NOC) elec­tions, where Vik­tar Lukashenko, son of Alexan­der Lukashenko, was re-elect­ed as pres­i­dent. This deci­sion effec­tive­ly val­i­dates a lead­er­ship deeply tied to the regime’s repres­sion of ath­letes and its broad­er crack­down on dis­sent. The stark con­trast between the IIHF’s firm stance and the IOC’s will­ing­ness to accom­mo­date author­i­tar­i­an con­trol in sports rais­es seri­ous ques­tions about con­sis­ten­cy in glob­al sports gov­er­nance.

While the fate of Russ­ian par­tic­i­pa­tion in the World Junior Cham­pi­onship and the Win­ter Olympics is yet to be deter­mined, Belaru­sian and Russ­ian clubs remain barred from the Cham­pi­ons League and Con­ti­nen­tal Cup. The final deci­sion on Belarus’ return in the 202627 sea­son will be made in May 2026.

The ban was ini­tial­ly imposed in Feb­ru­ary 2022 fol­low­ing Russia’s inva­sion of Ukraine, with the ille­gal Belaru­sian regime serv­ing as a key ally in the con­flict. As the IIHF upholds its deci­sion, the ques­tion remains: will oth­er inter­na­tion­al sports orga­ni­za­tions fol­low suit, or will they con­tin­ue enabling author­i­tar­i­an regimes to use ath­let­ics as a shield for polit­i­cal repres­sion?

🏒 What’s your take on this? Should sports stay neutral, or is this a necessary stance?