SIX HOSTS, THREE CONTINENTS, ONE CHAOS: INSIDE THE 2030 WORLD CUP

In 2030, the men’s FIFA World Cup will be staged like never before. To mark the 100th anniversary of the tournament’s inaugural edition, six countries across three continents will host the event. The announcement, made by FIFA, highlights both the ambition and complexity of what will be the most geographically expansive World Cup in history.
Spain, Portugal, and Morocco will serve as the primary hosts, while Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay will each stage one of the tournament’s opening matches. The gesture honors Uruguay’s role as the original 1930 host and champion. FIFA president Gianni Infantino called the arrangement a “unifying global celebration of football,” emphasizing the symbolic significance of linking the modern World Cup to its South American origins.
The 64-Team Question
While the logistics of coordinating matches across multiple continents are daunting in their own right, a new layer of complexity has emerged. South American soccer confederation CONMEBOL is lobbying to expand the 2030 World Cup to 64 teams. If approved, this would nearly double the number of matches from the 2022 edition, potentially surpassing 120 games.
This proposal has already sparked backlash. Victor Montagliani, president of CONCACAF, which governs soccer in North, Central America and the Caribbean, publicly opposed the idea. “We haven’t even kicked off the new 48-team format,” he told ESPN. “Expanding to 64 shouldn’t even be on the table.” UEFA’s Aleksander Čeferin and the Asian Football Confederation echoed these sentiments, warning that such a move could throw the tournament into chaos.
FIFA, for its part, confirmed the proposal had been “spontaneously raised” at a council meeting, but noted that no formal decision has been made. Still, the mere existence of the idea adds fuel to an already overheated conversation about the tournament’s scale.
Logistical Labyrinth
Hosting a World Cup is never simple, but the 2030 edition promises to be a logistical jigsaw of unprecedented complexity. Each of the six host nations comes with its own infrastructure, time zones, climates and political realities. Coordinating training facilities, travel schedules, security protocols and broadcasting logistics for 48 or possibly 64 teams will be nothing short of a miracle.
The tournament is set to kick off at Estadio Centenario in Montevideo, Uruguay, the site of the first-ever World Cup final. From there, it will crisscross the Atlantic, landing primarily in Spain, Portugal and Morocco. These three nations will bear the bulk of the matches and logistical responsibilities.
Alejandro Domínguez, president of CONMEBOL, framed the multi-country hosting model as a practical solution. “We’re talking about almost no other investment more than what already exists,” he said. “If this had been a competition based on financial commitments, we couldn’t have competed.”
His comments reflect a reality facing many nations: the immense cost of hosting a World Cup is often at odds with domestic priorities. By distributing the event, FIFA aims to lower the barrier to entry for less affluent countries, though critics question whether spreading resources so thin is truly cost-effective.
First-Time Hosts and Historical Echoes
For Morocco and Portugal, 2030 will mark their first time hosting a World Cup. Spain, by contrast, hosted the tournament in 1982. Morocco’s inclusion makes it the first North African nation to host World Cup matches, a symbolic step for African football’s growing prominence on the global stage.
Originally, Ukraine was floated as a potential co-host alongside Spain and Portugal. However, safety concerns related to the ongoing war led to its quiet removal from the proposal.
The 2026 World Cup will offer a preview of what’s to come. Hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, it will be the first edition to feature 48 teams. By 2030, organizers may find themselves juggling nearly double the number of teams and games, with stakes raised to match the centenary celebration.
Looking Ahead
FIFA’s Congress in 2024 is expected to ratify the 2030 hosting arrangement. Until then, debates over the tournament’s scope, logistics and financial burden will likely intensify.
What’s clear is that the 2030 FIFA World Cup will not just test the limits of the global game’s infrastructure, it will also challenge the sport’s ability to balance symbolism with sustainability, inclusion with practicality, and ambition with realism. Whether this celebration of football’s roots will succeed in uniting the world, or merely overwhelm it, remains to be seen.